Discount up to 35% for first purchase only this month.

Which Ultralight Tent Do I Prefer: MSR vs Big Agnes

Which Ultralight Tent Do I Prefer: MSR vs Big Agnes

I slept in both and I’ll reveal which ultralight tent actually made me hike faster, pack lighter, and sleep better—ready to be surprised?

I test ultralight backpacking tents on trails and compare MSR Hubba Hubba LT with Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL to choose which fits my needs for weight, livability, durability, and price.

Comfort Focused

MSR Hubba Hubba LT 2-Person Lightweight Backpacking Tent
MSR Hubba Hubba LT 2-Person Lightweight Backpacking Tent
Amazon.com
8.3

I find this tent to be one of the most livable ultralight two-person shelters — it balances interior space and functionality better than most. Setup is fast and the materials feel robust, though it carries a bit more weight than the absolute lightest options.

Ultralight Performance

Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL 2-Person Ultralight Tent
Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL 2-Person Ultralight Tent
Amazon.com
8.1

I appreciate how well this tent balances low weight and interior volume — setup hardware is smart and it feels engineered for real backcountry use. It’s a strong choice if you prioritize grams and thoughtful features, though the usable floor area can feel tighter compared with the most spacious models.

MSR Hubba LT

Weight & Packability
7.5
Durability & Build Quality
8.5
Livability & Space
9
Weather Protection & Venting
8

Big Agnes Spur

Weight & Packability
8.5
Durability & Build Quality
8
Livability & Space
7.5
Weather Protection & Venting
8.2

MSR Hubba LT

Pros
  • Exceptionally roomy rectangular floor plan for two
  • Excellent breathability with mostly micromesh body and good venting
  • Durable DAC poles and solution-dyed fabrics reduce environmental impact
  • Symmetrical hub system enables fast, intuitive setup
  • Two large vestibules give ample gear storage

Big Agnes Spur

Pros
  • Generally lighter pack weight and efficient packed size
  • High-volume design and good headroom improve livability
  • Thoughtful hardware (TipLok) and well-designed vestibules/awning
  • Strong selection of internal storage options and accessory compatibility

MSR Hubba LT

Cons
  • Slightly heavier than some ultralight competitors
  • Premium price relative to comparable-capacity ultralight tents

Big Agnes Spur

Cons
  • Listed floor area appears smaller than some competitors in class
  • Some users report needing extra stakes/guylines in severe conditions
1

Fit for Purpose: Weight, Packability, and Setup

Weight on the trail

I compare the published trail/minimum weights to see which actually saves ounces on long miles. The MSR Hubba Hubba LT lists a minimum trail weight of 3 lb (1.36 kg), while the Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL (listed weight 1370 g) is about 3.02 lb (1.37 kg). In practice they’re nearly identical; MSR has a hair’s‑edge on paper.

MSR Hubba Hubba LT minimum trail weight: 3 lb (1.36 kg)
Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL listed weight: 1370 g (~3.02 lb / 1.37 kg)

Packability

The MSR packs down slimmer: 20 x 5.5 in (51 x 14 cm). The Copper Spur’s stuff sack sits bulkier around 26 x 9 x 5 in. That slimmer MSR tube tucks better in an external pocket or alongside my sleeping pad; Copper Spur usually rides inside the main compartment.

Setup: speed and pitching in bad weather

Both are freestanding, but setup feel differs. MSR’s unified hub and symmetrical clips let me erect it nearly blind in rain — fast and intuitive. Big Agnes’ hub-driven geometry and TipLok buckles give higher volume and superb tension once staked, but it takes a touch more time to align poles and secure awning vestibules. In wind or steady rain I can muscle up the Hubba quicker; the Copper Spur rewards those extra seconds with a roomier, taut shelter once guyed out.

MSR vs Big Agnes: Feature Comparison

MSR Hubba LT vs. Big Agnes Spur
MSR Hubba Hubba LT 2-Person Lightweight Backpacking Tent
VS
Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL 2-Person Ultralight Tent
Brand
MSR
VS
Big Agnes
Model
Hubba Hubba LT 2
VS
Copper Spur HV UL (UL2)
Trail / Item Weight
3.38 Pounds (minimum trail weight 3.0 lb / 1.36 kg)
VS
1370 Grams (approx 3.02 lb)
Packed Size
20 x 5.5 in (51 x 14 cm)
VS
26 x 9 x 5 in (item dimensions)
Floor Area
32 Square Feet
VS
19 Square Feet
Vestibule Area
16 Square Feet (two vestibules)
VS
9 Square Feet (two vestibules; awning style option)
Peak Height
40 in (1.02 m)
VS
40 Inches
Number of Doors
2
VS
2
Number of Vestibules
2
VS
2
Pole Material
DAC NFL Aluminum
VS
DAC aluminum (pre-curved tension rod)
Tent Fabric
100% Solution-Dyed Ripstop Nylon (body, fly, floor)
VS
Proprietary ultralight nylon with double reinforced ripstop
Water Resistance Rating
1,200 – 1,800 mm
VS
1200 mm
Floor Material / Coating
Nylon floor (taped seams, durable DWR finish)
VS
Nylon with silicone and polyurethane coating
Included Stakes
8 Mini-Groundhog aluminum stakes
VS
8 DAC aluminum J stakes
Setup System
Unified hub and pole system with clips
VS
TipLok tent buckle with clip attachments and Velcro tabs
Packaged Weight
1.54 Kilograms (package weight)
VS
1.41 Kilograms (package weight)
Packed Dimensions
19.63 x 5 x 4 inches (item package dimensions)
VS
19.4 x 6.4 x 4.7 inches (item package dimensions)
Minimum Trail Weight
3 Pounds (1.36 kg)
VS
1370 g (manufacturer listed packed weight)
Warranty
3 Year Manufacturer
VS
Limited lifetime warranty (component-specific terms apply)
Price
$$$
VS
$$
2

Comfort & Livability: Interior Space, Ventilation, and Weather Performance

Interior space & doors

The MSR Hubba Hubba LT’s 32 sq ft floor and 40 in peak height made it plainly roomier for two with big rectangular pads and a couple of packs. Door placement is symmetric and zippers close to a single point — easy in the dark.

The Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL (listed 19 sq ft floor, 40 in peak) felt tighter on paper, but the high‑volume pole geometry gave usable headroom where you need it most. Dual doors/vestibules and the awning-style vestibule expanded usable space for cooking in drizzle.

Ventilation, condensation, and weather

I slept multiple nights in steady rain and gusty wind. MSR’s mostly-mesh body and large kickstand vents minimized condensation — I woke with damp fly but a dry inner floor. The Hubba’s StayDry gutters kept vestibule drip off my gear.

Big Agnes, with more fabric panels and a tighter fly fit, trapped a bit more overnight moisture on calm, cool nights. When I staked and guyed the Copper Spur, its tensioned fly shed driving rain and handled wind better; without good guying it felt slacker and collected spray.

MSR strengths: larger internal floor, excellent breathability, bigger vestibules for wet gear.
Big Agnes strengths: higher perceived volume, better tautness and sheltered awning when guyed, more privacy from fabric panels.
3

Durability, Materials, and Value: Construction, Hardware, and Support

Fabric, seams, and abrasion resistance

I like MSR’s solution‑dyed ripstop — it resists UV fading and looks less worn season after season. MSR also lists taped seams and a PFAS‑free DWR, which in my experience cuts down on seam leakage and long‑term fabric degradation. Big Agnes uses a proprietary ultra‑light nylon with double reinforced ripstop; it’s impressively light and tear‑resistant for its weight, but more panels and fabric joins mean more potential abrasion points over hard use.

Zippers, closures, and hardware

MSR’s no‑curve doors and simple single‑point zips are easy to manipulate with one hand and feel robust. Big Agnes’ double zips and TipLok buckles are clever — the TipLok both secures pole tips and tensions the fly, which reduces wear on corners. I’ve found Big Agnes hardware to be well thought out but slightly more complex to service in the field.

Poles, stakes, and real‑world holding power

Both use DAC aluminum poles; MSR’s unified hub system is stout and fast to pitch, while Copper Spur’s pre‑curved poles and 4‑way hub increase interior volume and stability. MSR includes Mini‑Groundhog stakes (chunkier, very secure); Big Agnes supplies ultralight J‑stakes that save weight but can slip in soft ground. Both tents accept stronger aftermarket stakes if needed.

Warranty and long‑term value

MSR offers a 3‑year manufacturer warranty; Big Agnes’ layered warranty (multi‑year/lifetime on select parts) is more generous. Street price favors Big Agnes for lower cost per season if you’re weight‑conscious; MSR costs more up front but I expect slightly longer rugged service under heavy use. My value judgment weighs your priorities: buy MSR for hard‑use longevity, Big Agnes for lighter‑weight day‑in/day‑out value.


Final Verdict: Which Tent I’d Choose

MSR: rugged reliability and simple setup — best for stormy, technical trips. Big Agnes: lighter, roomier comfort-for-two — ideal for fast-and-light, cozy two-person outings.

I pick the Big Agnes Copper Spur HV for balance of weight and livability; pick MSR for harsher weather. Ready?

1
Comfort Focused
MSR Hubba Hubba LT 2-Person Lightweight Backpacking Tent
Amazon.com
MSR Hubba Hubba LT 2-Person Lightweight Backpacking Tent
2
Ultralight Performance
Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL 2-Person Ultralight Tent
Amazon.com
Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL 2-Person Ultralight Tent
Signup our newsletter to get update information, news, insight or promotions.
Ads
Discount up to 50% for new member only this month
Related Article